Fortnite The End gameplay screenshot 1

Over the last few years, Fortnite has been a phenomenon. Epic Games’s battle royale stole the crown of popularity from Minecraft and has maintained its place in the centre of gaming culture with constant updates that coerces players back time and again. It is the kind of game that seemingly every AAA developer is aiming to make right now—a game-as-a-service that is not derided for being such.

This past week, Epic stepped up its efforts, capturing and enrapturing the gaming world (and beyond) by hitting the self-destruct button. After a season of special events with crossovers to other IPs and various miscellaneous weirdness, the island—home to millions of conflicts over the past two years—vanished.

The move was bold and ballsy, and it worked. Reports say that some six million gamers tuned in to livestreams to watch The End. The impact is undeniable.

Fortnite The End gameplay screenshot 3

But what has any of this to do with single-player gaming? Fortnite is a multiplayer game, and streaming is a fundamentally social activity—the very antithesis of single-player gaming (though that, of course, is not to revert to the ridiculous, harmful trope of all single-player gamers being shut-ins living off their parents’ good graces). What The End, the black hole, the six millions viewers represents is a challenge to the creators of single-player games to match and exceed it.

We live in an age of early access, episodic games, and live services, initiatives intended to enable developers to factor in player feedback and keep fingers on keyboards and controllers for as long as possible. However, those systems are not being taken full advantage of. 

For episodic games, the hype dies over time (where is the excitement for the upcoming final part of Life is Strange 2?). Live services are derided for detracting from the quality of the initial launch, never to recapture the pre-release spark (Rage 2 and Anthem say hello). Early access games flop into their final existence with minimal fanfare (Green Hell, anyone?).

These games trundle along the course of their existence, adding pieces and events, largely expecting the press and social media to do the work of selling the new content, much as is possible in TV. Engagement in traditional media is interactive, but engagement in games is embodied interactivity, and that is why the black hole was so successful. Epic tapped into the players’ active involvement in Fortnite to shock everyone out of their torpor. It was surprising and bold in a way that almost no game has dared to be since, perhaps, Final Fantasy XIV became A Realm Reborn.

Fortnite The End gameplay screenshot 2

A cataclysmic, world-shaking event makes little sense in a single-player game, but nor is it necessary to tap into the kind of effect generated by the black hole. 

The single-player experience is at a strange point in its history. Strictly linear games are becoming ever rarer as the domination of endlessly engaging open worlds continues. As a result, the format has fallen into a rut. Worlds are built up for years, then embedded with stuff—fetch quests, kill missions, and occasionally a Radiant Story or Nemesis System to make things seem alive. Meanwhile, the central storylines plod along, following the well-worn tropes of the Hero’s Journey.

They lack for that systemic, evolutionary something that enables true surprise—that will make players the world over sit up and take notice. 

What that something is, I don’t know. Twirlbound created an evolving world for Pine, but it does not surprise in the same way that the black hole did. The same goes for Middle-Earth: Shadow of Mordor and its sequel. Simply adding the possibility of emergence to a traditional game structure is not enough. The storytelling capability of games needs a fundamental rethink. Perhaps Ken Levine’s new immersive sim will do it. Perhaps not.

All I know is that Fortnite’s black hole has left me with a sentiment that I never thought I would express:

Single-player developers, be like Fortnite. Be bold.

Damien Lawardorn
Damien Lawardorn is an aspiring novelist, journalist, and essayist. His goal in writing is to inspire readers to engage and think, rather than simply consume and enjoy. With broad interests ranging from literature and video games to fringe science and social movements, his work tends to touch on the unexpected. Damien is the former Editor-in-Chief of OnlySP. More of his work can be found at

Vampire: The Masquerade – Swansong Narrative RPG Gets First Details

Previous article

2D Platformer Grim Earth Doubles in Size With New Update

Next article


  1. These is no single player, It requires you connect to the internet. Why is this concept so hard to grasp for that people that “supposedly” run a website dedicated to single player games? Translation…..find a new career choice.

    1. Two problems.
      One: online connectivity doesn’t mean multiplayer. The delivery of new episodes of games like Life is Strange or The Walking Dead proves that.
      Two: I’m not saying that every game needs to have this sort of massive live service event. Rather, single-player games need to engage and surprise a broader audience through the use of innovative storytelling similar to (which doesn’t mean exactly the same as) what just happened in Fortnite.

    2. Probably ideal to read the article before criticising.

  2. Even I, who don’t give a damn about Fortnite, was as surprised and curious with this black hole. It was really interesting and creative as well.

  3. I’ve never played Fortnite…likely never will (same goes for any other MP-only game). But am I understanding this right : if I were to jump in and start playing today, the original experience up to this point is nonexistent now??

    1. I don’t play it either, but that’s my understanding.

    2. Correct. The game effectively “rebooted and revamped.” It would be comparable to the new Call of Duty deleting the prior Call of Duty when it releases…..except you still have any in-game skins you purchased from before, so those RMT items still remain. But the game itself might as well be “Fortnite, new release” right now.

Comments are closed.

You may also like